Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Keegan L. Rogers's avatar

I think that often when there’s a heel-turn in the NBA by an already great player, they usually leave the team with less success. Like when KD left the Thunder, they were a first round exit the following season and didn’t make a ton of noise until amassing an infinity stone’s worth of players and draft picks. So there isn’t really that sense of vindication or justice within Thunder fans.

I think ultimately a villain in the NBA, at its core, is a foil to a hero. Someone who is likely playing the same position as the hero of the league so there’s lots of one on one play and apples-to-apples comparisons with respect to stats. They also have to play against each other a lot so as to make it marketable.

The problem with the NBA today (Bron heading towards retirement with a lot of other household name superstars aging) is that the villain has to be someone who can compete with the face of the league, which we don’t have a new one quite yet. One could argue SGA, but there’s so much memeing and other sentiment online about his foul-baiting tactics being a pain to watch.

In my ideal world, the story would have two backcourt guards thrive on a big market team together and playoff success or maybe a chip together. One abruptly leaves to a worse team (with some accompanying media drama, maybe some narrative about being in the shadow) and both of them skyrocket into superstardom. by putting up insane number and amazing records for their respective teams. One of these guys has to be the widely beloved household name face of the NBA. Then they meet in the finals or something. Then the narrative is always one-to one against the arch rival, backstabbing villain. But at the core of it all, they’ve both GOT to be superstar basketball players.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?